Auto Exposure issue ?

[Suthriel]

@YordanY

I passed at least 50 tutorial about archviz and none went specific about these problems. Like they are not existing. Even the guys from Unreal engine in live stream somehow magical they are not havimg this weird supernovae light or eyes killing, which never hapens in real life ( except you are having some glaucoma or something ) autoexposure…

I have no clue, if there is an up to date ArchViz tutorial out there, that actually uses all this new stuff. Most seem to be using older stuff, which nowadays can lead to weird results, cuz much have changed during the last few releases of UE (like that SunSky Actor and the new atmosphere system).

I guess, that answers my question with a big fat NOPE

Other than that, you have been given multiple answers to your questions, but it seems, there is a fundamental problem: The difference between what you EXPECT to happen, and what actually happens or how things really work. You just need to connect the dots, see how things are linked together and influence each other, and start to understand, instead of read and memorize.

F.E. your assumption that “false results” automatically equals “bad results”. Just for fun, this here is a totally accurate and real photo of a Tesla Roadster… in space :

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/nU9Tlc7tFeDpmVMAzSzAgt7OE3U=/16x8:1067x599/720x405/media/img/mt/2018/02/26871349_212376212658777_1327127358112530432_n/original.jpg

Thats reality for you, not what most people expect. Every scifi artist would render it in a more beautiful way, if he had to do it in CGI. Physically accurate? Absolutely. Good looking? … errr… depends.