I’ve recently upgraded my 4.14.3 project to 4.15 without issues, but soon after I found that when compiling my code, Visual Studio 2015 will spit out two errors:
Failed to produce item: E:\UnrealProjects\xxx\Intermediate\Build\Win64\UE4Editor\Development\UE4Editor-xxx-9961.lib
MSB3075 The command ""D:\Epic Games\UE_4.15\Engine\Build\BatchFiles\Build.bat" xxxEditor Win64 Development "E:\UnrealProjects\xxx\xxx.uproject" -waitmutex" exited with code 5. Please verify that you have sufficient rights to run this command.
While it does spit out these errors, it seems to compile just fine.
I’ve already regenerated my VS project files from the .uproject file to no avail.
Can anybody assist?
Edit:
Okay, it doesn’t compile at all and I have to restart the editor in between compiles…
I’m trying to compile in the editor and get a different .lib error each time i build it. It persists with random .lib errors through restarts (all in the same path as OP).
I wonder @kbrizov. Any improvements noticed with VS2017 compared to 2015? Better compile speeds maybe? What about the crazy slow IntelliSense from VS2015?
Well, Visual Studio 2017 introduces some cool C++ features like in Visual Assist and Resharper C++. For example, by default the dot operator (.) is now replaced with arrow (->). It also has some nice new visual changes. Other than that I am relatively new to developing with Unreal and it seems that the issue with Intellisense is still here. It’s very slow. I have a C#/Unity background and I am used to lightening fast intellisense. The only thing that “fixes” this slow intellisense is Visual Assist. Resharper is super slow too.
Visual Assist has a 30 day trial period, so you can test it yourself. The installation is super easy too. It’s very nice. It does not remove your intellisense it just improves it and adds many cool features that help you. I definitely recommend it
@kbrizov Thanks for the answer and recommendation.
Can I use Visual Assist to replace Intellisense altogether (turn it off and still have the same features)? Because still having Intellisense running in the background doesn’t seem like a pleasant thought…
@DropBear77 Either this is a regression or it is due to the fact that your engine is built from source (unlike mine). In any case, I have not encountered this problem ever since 4.15.1. I suggest you create a new question on this matter.