So in my emitter which has a SubUV texture (2x2 frames), i,m attempting to have random starting frame (set to 0), and a random frame rate setting the distribution to uniform values, yet whathever i do it just starts flickering the frames fast and flickery even if i set values like max 1 min 0, it just goes super fast still not going for the values i enter.
Also tried to have a curve, they the rate of the frames wont change through time, they play the animation repeatedly and repetitively no matter what values i play with in the curve.
here is my current curve setting for example
Is this possible? are this features working properly?
I did that exact thing you told me, now frames dont blend into each other, nor display random starting frame. I cant go for uniform frame rate still, they do the same issue i had when they just flicker fast. And random starting frame by setting it to 0 like it says does not work either. Under requirements, under the SubUv options i went for Random Blend…not luck either. i mean the most obvious features which describe what i want to achieve dont work and mess up one or other thing :(, frustrating…for such simple endeavor like this :(.
here is the effect along with the issues i,m having if you wanna try:
I did that exact thing you told me, now frames dont blend into each other, nor display random starting frame. I cant go for uniform frame rate still, they do the same issue i had when they just flicker fast. And random starting frame by setting it to 0 like it says does not work either. Under requirements, under the SubUv options i went for Random Blend…not luck either. i mean the most obvious features which describe what i want to achieve dont work and mess up one or other thing :(, frustrating…for such simple endeavor like this :(.
here is the effect along with the issues i,m having if you wanna try:
You want to use a uniformDistribution with the min set to your start frame, 0 and max set to your end frame, 3. Make sure you are using a particleSubUVTextureSampler and not a standard texture sampler node in your material network.
Still working on your example setup, but this particular issue is working. I believe your problem is the sampling size of your frames and their similarity. I have attached a modified version of your effect with an exaggerated example of the Sub UV Movie module working.
I checked your example effect, the random initial frame seems to work, not the blending, therefore this isn’t entirely helpful for my case.
How did you got that random initial frame working? I,m not sure, your input was: ‘I believe your problem is the sampling size of your frames and their similarity’ which does not help me acknowledge much. Whats wrong with the size? Whats wrong with the frame’s similarity? they are meant to look similar but they are NOT the same they are meant to blend from one frame to the next so it doesn’t look jerky.
Eric what i,m trying to achieve is the BLEND, so random textures…fine, but they would need to blend from one frame to the next otherwise its looks poppy and bad. Blending only seems to work within the Linear Blend setting yet i need a RANDOM setting but WITH blend, so i though it would be Random Blend but this one wont blend the frames into the next but just pop the next one in.
The reason why i,m using 2x2 SubUv textures is because i want to use small simple SubUv textures that can just loop with blend and still look good. But anyhow, no matter how simple the texture would be and the few frames it would have, the overdraw issue is MELTING our tester’s fps at the moment. This is all within CPU particles since GPU don’t seem to have UV settings.
So in the case of a lingering smoke with the setting you sent, it wont work because even if they show randomly the smoke animation will not blend the frames to the next one so it will look bad and it will flicker. So smoke can never look good like that, and dust/smoke animation will look terrible without blend and with few frames like in this case, and this is supposed to be a next gen engine.
How is my problem withing the ‘size’ of my texture? whats wrong with it?
Problem with similarity? SubUv textures must have similar size frames. In the case of my texture the smoke puff frames look similar but they are not, they are suppose to loop from one frame to the next ij order too look like they are lingering.
Again, the blending is not there. Again i,m gonna go ahead and just say this feature does not work currently? Or at least I still don’t have a simple comfortable way to set this up, and i,m gonna ask: Why do you have a “Random BLEND” feature at all if its not gonna blend the frames at all like in the Linear Blend option?
I still don’t have a clear response nor solution. This seems very unintuitive and features don’t work as its said to work so how many users will find this frustration?
Sorry to sound kinda harsh but i,m starting to get really worried about my project’s FX , i feel so stagnated with all these complications
Hope you could understand, hopefully all of this can be improved in the next Cascade iterations.
Remove the SubUV Movie from your Module list and add a SubUV Index module and set to a Uniform Distribution of Min 0 Max 3. (Takes care of the random start location) In the Required Module >> SubUV change the Interpolation Method Mode to Random Blend and change the Random Image Changes to 4. (Should address the random play blending you are after).
It wont work with gpu particles :(, Random nor random Blend Interpolation method :(.
I need it to be gpu since its flying debris, so i,m looking to have collition (wtich only works withing gpu particles) and display random patricle textures through a Uv flipbook.
Will this be addressed in the next iteration of Cascade?
I’ve put in a request for our engineers to look into a way to implement this feature, for reference it is UE-5219. I will keep you informed as we investigate this feature
Oh fantastic thanks! yeah it will be very useful for debris, sparks and other natural phenomena. Also in general it will be great to be able to manage this more easily in the future.
I wrote a request list with all my stubborn hindrances i,m having with Cascade:
Hope it can improve in the future, I’ve heard you guys are developing something like Cascade 2.0 or Niagara?