Summary
loop seems to “forget” that it’s inside a failure context, disallowing any failable expressions to be nested in it.
Please select what you are reporting on:
Verse
What Type of Bug are you experiencing?
Verse
Steps to Reproduce
if:
loop:
false?
break
Expected Result
The loop block allows failable expressions inside it, that would cause the enclosing failure context to fail.
Observed Result
Failable expressions cause a generic compiler error that states the <decides> call is not in a failure context, despite the fact that the if has created one. The loop should act like a block (or for) in this case, which both work correctly.
Platform(s)
UEFN v40.20
Upload an image
Additional Notes
The second screenshot I attached above is further confusing, showing that removing the failable expression (the query operator in false?) gives the if a compiler error stating that it doesn’t have any failable expressions in its clause, meaning that it recognises loop as a valid place for failure to nest.