NEW(3/22/2024) UE5.5+ Feedback: Please Invest In Actual PERFORMANCE Innovations Beyond Frame Smearing For Actual GAMES.

[vfXander]

@TheKJ

I did a test with 10,000. The GPU was faster rendering 5 million triangles over nanite “crunching” it down to 4000

Those are the same instances. I’m talking about thousands of instances from hundreds of different meshes of any kind. Like, you know, a real game.

@TheKJ

That depends, if you’re game is so unperformant it needs an blurry upscaler, it will look look like smeary pixels when you move the camera(so basically gameplay/all the time). Doesn’t really make sense to say it looks better except when you stop the camera to take a screenshot and use that instance as the promotional images.

You notice any smearing when you go below 75% upscale. And the heavy lifters are Lumen and VSM, Nanite does its job properly.

@TheKJ

You know what go ahead. If customers don’t like what they see, they will review it for others.

Yeah, I’ve been going ahead for over two years now and people clearly love what I’m doing, either from images, videos, and closed beta testing. What have you done?

@TheKJ

Every UE game that has impressed me performance wise, didn’t use Nanite.

How many games have been released that used Nanite since the beginning of their development? Likely none. It’s too early to tell.

@TheKJ

If you don’t like my test GO MAKE YOUR OWN.
If such a huge difference in small test can be seen, what do you expect from a real scene? And stop treating me like I’m the only who did test. (I linked 5 other test by 5 other people)

Go optimize your scene and compare it with the Nanite version.
You’re like everyone else I meet who goes insane and insulting when someone says Nanite isn’t god’s’ gift to rendering meshes.

You have the choice of choosing yourself or your customer’s when you optimize vs slapping on Nanite.

I don’t have time to do tests as I’m making a game instead. Those tests are likely flawed because they don’t are as complex as a real-life scenario. All demo scenes I’ve seen converted to Nanite meshes performed better.

@TheKJ

By the 30 series, that card is 20% slower than a 3060. So at 1080p, your game should run 48fps at native 1080p.
If you are hitting above that then good for you and your customers who give you their money.
But you said you’re making a racing game.
Not exactly expecting that to require the maximum amount of resources out of UE5 anyways.

It’s actually 2% faster than a 3060: UserBenchmark: Nvidia GTX 1080 vs RTX 3060
And that 48fps where is even coming from? Should run? Because every game is the same in terms of level complexity?
And since when a racing game doesn’t require the maximum amount of resources from an engine? In fact, that’s the opposite, since you need to push high speed on top of good visuals.