Would not be a good idea to block reported seller from selling till he prove that he owns rights to resell someone else staff?
Just asking since I did have a long conversation with fab support.
Seller that I did reported has been remove only because I asked how many DMC reports that person has to get be removed? Because then I did mention that already few sellers report him but non action against him has been taken.
Lets say I did manage to take down this seller by corresponding with Fab Support. But, it is not how it should be, I’m not even marketplace content seller. I should not care
Maybe its irritating that customers have to do the job.
Anyways, here is for context my conversation with Fab support that on the end finally did take some action.
“GhostLineStudios” seller sold the free for the month of August 2024 Skeletal Modular asset created by Buxoided, it was removed after we on this thread and other users made several stolen content reports to FAB team, BUT the seller “GhostLineStudios” was not banned, and now he is AGAIN selling stolen content…
Why do you allow this? @Unreal_Josh
10 stolen asset packs was not enough to ban him?
I am very happy that you took action when he sold the stolen assets a week ago, but obviously more action is needed, this seller slipped through your asset review system AGAIN, this is not bringing much trust to FAB, this kind of things bring only distrust to FAB, and buyers are afraid to buy anything.
If you don’t mind me asking, exactly what is wrong with the medieval weaponry pack? Altough, it’s sitting pretty low on my list of things that I probably need
Considering these and the fact that other packs from this Epic ‘Verified Seller’ were 100% stolen I’d assume that both new packs are nothing different.
how do i know?
just check the “source file” names on the assets on the asset packs, then you can find the original assets from google,
all assets on his packs are stolen from other asset packs and sketchfab:
C:/Users/onema/Downloads/medieval-war-hammer/source/WarHammerSF.fbx
…/…/…/…/Users/brank/Desktop/Interiors Environment/WEAPONS PACK/Axes/Axe_02/Maps/UE4/Axe_02_None_Roughness.tif
…/…/…/…/…/…/Users/brank/Desktop/Interiors Environment/WEAPONS PACK/Shields/Shield_01/Shield_01.fbx
both these packs are filled with stolen content:
Ek Order Complete Environment
Ultimate Medieval Weapon & Shield Pack
the “Ek Order” encironment has assets from multiple asset packs, you can see asssets like that carpet on the screenshot, it is from modular victorian pack.
He doesn’t appear to be banned, I can still see his profile. This is truly disgraceful. I honestly can’t comprehend how someone who repeatedly has their listings removed for blatantly stolen assets can just come back and continue posting more stolen content. It’s beyond any logic that there’s no strike system or something, anything! I’m genuinely flabbergasted.
I will recommend to all indie developers I know not to buy anything from FAB since Epic clearly does not give a sh*t if violating assets end up to commercial games sold on Steam etc stores…
This wasn’t a case where we intentionally let them back. GhoostLines Studios was previously removed from the Fab ecosystem. GhoostLines Studio is a new account created by the same person/group after the first account was removed.
The second account has been removed from the Fab ecosystem as well. We’re working on improving our tooling and process so it isn’t easy for bad actors to return.
I am sorry if I came so hard on the comments, but this is a serious issue.
The problem is that byers currently do not know if they are legally allowed to use an asset they buy from FAB, this is very scary for a small indie developer who depends on assets created by others.
If we buy an asset that is violating someones rights, and then we use that mentioned asset on a commercial game, we -the game developers- will get the blame on Steam etc for using illegal asset, and we could possibly face legal problems.