I thought the search function was going to be fixed.

I searched this morning with a simple request for handbags. Although there were a few handbags at the top of the search, as you can see by the screenshot, scrolling down slightly the search threw up sandbags, lots of them. After scrolling passed all them there were more handbags.

Looking forward to the search function being fixed.

I would have posted this in Issues and bugs. But I canā€™t post IMGā€™s as an example. soā€¦

ā€¦Two days since first posting and Itā€™s not any better. On the plus side there were more bags above these Lady of the night, Barbed wire, inventory sounds and other random entries.

Yeah, itā€™s on their list of things to improve. Might take an month or two for them to get around to it

Hi @Satintribe . Thanks for sharing that - the team made some improvements to search last week and is continuing to iterate to get it to a better place. Thanks for your patience - Iā€™ve passed the example that you provided to the team.

So 7 days since I first posted and 5 since Abby passed on the examples I gave.
Things have got a tiny bit better at the top of the search, but after just a little scroll itā€™s all still random entries (Screenshot taken just now).
I have used the same search example.
Spot the handbagā€¦


.

While Iā€™m talking about the search function Iā€™d like to see some randomisation to the top entries.
They are always the same. Iā€™m not complaining because none of mine are ever at the top, Iā€™m complaining because, fairness for all.

But back to the search functionā€¦I appreciate that

but itā€™s really taking some time to get there.

Iā€™m beginning to think you might be right!
Itā€™s been two weeks now since I first posted about this. Iā€™ve just taken some screen shots with the same search title and itā€™s still ā€¦

Producing doubles


.

Sandbagsā€¦lots of them.

.
And lastlyā€¦lots of military stuff. On the plus side, the Provocative girl and the Broadway lady are holding a bags!
.

2 Likes

Try searching ā€œrockā€.

Youā€™ll get rocking chairs. Such a meme at this point, so broken.

At least it has rock in itā€¦we can consider that a good result!

Although, Iā€™m a little worried about the search algo! It seems if you search handbag, among other things, youā€™ll get a Lady of the night and Girl-Provocation. It seems the search engine equates handbags with a certain type of woman :neutral_face:

Weā€™re going to continue tweaking the search algorithm over time. Itā€™s not an exact science and this is not an issue that is ā€œbrokenā€ vs ā€œfixedā€ - we need to keep checking results and making small improvements.

For now, Iā€™d recommend drilling into specific categories and sub-categories to help find what you need. For the ā€œrockā€ example, going down to Nature & Plants returns rocks as expected:

https://www.fab.com/category/3d-model/nature-plants?q=rock

@PadreZippo When I say broken, Iā€™m meaning if I search for ā€œrockā€ why does with ā€œrelevanceā€ sorting it give me rocking chairs?

Everything in 1 giant pool is so cumbersome and bloated. Even with category searching being a C4D user a huge portion of what I see is not usable.

By catering for all with this philosophy, itā€™s such a terrible experience.

Indeed, we definitely need to improve search results like this.

Can you elaborate on this? Even with top-level search not being as good as it could be, are you missing filters or categories that would let you better find what youā€™re looking for?

For example, ā€œrockā€ query under 3D Models ā†’ Nature & Plants, with C4D, OBJ, and FBX formats selected. Are those not useable in C4D?

@PadreZippo sorry that 2nd point wasnā€™t related to ā€œrockā€ but Fab as a whole.

Letā€™s go with ā€œcliffā€ as a broader example. At a top level this gives me everything for all DCCā€™s, so I then have to select the exchange formats (fbx, obj, etc).

Why canā€™t this be a preference at the account level so I can filter EVERYTHING out that isnā€™t applicable to meā€¦? Having to do this for every search is cumbersome and seems not thought through. Plus seeing all the irrelevant content has Fab feeling very messy.

Furthermore if I want to filter out Quixel assets to see alternate uploads there is no way to do that. Quixel needs its own seperate portal, all pro vendors need their own portal.

Weā€™re definitely thinking about making more search filters persist throughout a session (similar to the Mature filter selection), and/or adding more account-level settings to this effect.

Weā€™re planning to add filter by publisher, as well as filtering out already owned assets. We also want to make it easier to see at a glance the publishers in the results as you scroll (e.g. the avatar and publisher name persistent, rather than just an avatar on hover). Although I havenā€™t heard this specific need to filter out a seller.

@PadreZippo if I go into the last point more, Quixel assets are in the hundreds in some key categories.

Letā€™s say I want to search for scans that existed previously on Sketchfab, with the amount of Quixel assets all alternate assets are quite tricky to find (rocks for example)

Excluding Quixel from this search would help a lot (itā€™s one of the only examples I can think of where an exclusion would be helpful)

The ability to follow or filter out specific seller is quite frequently asked for in the forum. (example: Allow self moderation/filtering - it can help with overall moderation.). Moreover, we need full-featured ban lists for sellers to get rid of AI scam and stolen content as Fab lets it in. If you didnā€™t see those requests then your ā€œI share that with teamā€ bots are not well-programmed.

And finally, learn how to sort search results by datetime (ā€˜Newestā€™) - itā€™s coming from ā€˜funnyā€™ to ā€˜ridiculousā€™ as rate of publishing of new assets increases.

1 Like

Because some of them specializes in uploading some content that we canā€™t commercially use, for one.

I just checked how the search function was performing using the same search title Iā€™ve been using.
I could have posted some screen shoots, but they would have been almost exactly the same as I have posted over the last 3 weeks.

Could I suggest that some larger improvements are made, because those small improvements just arenā€™t doing it!