I’d remove the oneminus… and try setting ‘edge balance’ between 50 and 100.
Pretty sure there is a world setting to control the distance which distance fields are sampled for these purposes but I’m not in a position to look it up what it’s called.
Keep in mind that I’m not sure if this has any quality ramifications. Like with volumetrics, if you increase the range, it will lower the overall voxel density. I’m not sure if the global distance field memory pool tries to stay at some fixed size or not or if by increasing this distance, it also increases how much memory it uses. You’ll need to experiment.
I had a similar issue with a shoreline water material effect and this doesn’t completely fix the problem, but mostly mitigates it.
EDIT: Here is an example from a random terrian
The camera wasn’t moved and this is a view of the global distance field. It looks like it does drop in quality some, but not really in any meaningful way(look at the foreground cliffs area near the bottom-right of the images and notice how they are smoother vs the 20k version)







