What's so dangerous about UWP ?

[FrankieV]

@MaxiHori;508375

now THIS is what we should be fighting for, let me place the same app in different marketplace with different price and THAN we can talk about platform choices, cause right now there are none.

Cut and paste

For example, Comcast struck a deal with Microsoft that allowed users to stream television through the Xfinity app on their Xbox 360s without it affecting their bandwidth limit. However, utilizing other television streaming apps, such as Netflix, HBO Go, and Hulu, counted towards the limit. Comcast denied that this infringed on net neutrality principles since “it runs its Xfinity for Xbox service on its own, private Internet protocol network.

As I said it’s not about buying products but about the “possibility” of creating a so called Universal anything that can be tailored to meet the best interests of any given company as bandwidth being sold like any other form of commodity like Orange Juice, Oil, or Wheat that can effect the return rates of digital products being brought to market. I’m not suggesting that Microsoft is evil by nature but by nature they are required by law to act in the best interest of the company and in turn and in turn in the best interests of those who invest in Microsoft stock

And yes there are hidden costs both up front as well as after sale.

As for portals like Steam that delivers “content” they by themselves do not effect the “ecosystem” no more than your choice of fruit or vegetable stands along the highway but if you own the road to and from the stands and apply an unfair toll then someone has to pay the added costs and worst.

It’s not about application as to end user use but rather the treatment of bandwidth as a commodity to be sold on wall street and suffer the same from the same abuses that historically we should all know by now.