In some parts of the model there can be areas of a suposedly flat surface, that has seemingly random patches either sunken in or hovering. I realise that this is to do with cameras that are not properly aligned.
My question is now if I can predict such areas before I process a huge area. Otherwise i will keep having to go back to adding control points, process againg and so on.
If this workflow cannot be avoided it yould be nice to be able to select the “dense point cloud” in order to identify the responsible cameras. Somewhere else it has been suggested to introduce a colour coded representation of how points correspond to cameras, which is somewhat related to this.
I didn’t notice this behaviour in photoscan. Is that because the results in RC are so much more accurate that it becomes an issue?
PS - I cannot provide Screenshots right now because I need to get a licence first… :mrgreen:
Hi Götz
Its look like bad alignment, when get it back would be great to see it so can say what can be done…
Hi Wishgranter,
I know what can be done - either new images (no option atm) or more Control Points. 
I had similar issues before, but in this case it seems to be at a border between areas with differing distances of the cameras to the object.
Just wanted to know if there are any tools that I can use to identify problematic areas without actually processing them.
If the inspection tool would be suitable for that, I haven’t been able to figure out how…