If I understand these options correctly, I think they should be changed to “auto-sync” for “replicated”, and “event called” for “repnotify” or something close to that to clarify how they work. I notice that many of your names change through versions (going through the older tutorials), so I thought I would suggest this. And actually, this could be a pinned topic (naming suggestions) for improving the interface.
I don’t think they should be changed. Replicated makes sense to me 100% as does “replicated notify”. These specifiers are also used throughout the C++ code and macros. Changing them would be a humongous task.
Apparently it’s not a humongous task as they change the names of things and move them in the editors all the time between versions. It would only be a problem for someone who has written code targeting an older version of the engine, trying to use a newer engine. But that hasn’t stopped them before, so…
Dunno, those changes have quite a different scale, rename few methods for specific object and rename the name of replication system.
Even if we accept as a fact, your names are better, which i disagree.