Proof it or stop harassing me.
Plenty of people using Lightmass for Modding games see their CPUs @ 100% and even the Best Professionals cannot solve Heating Issues in Hot climates. Inregards to “tricking your system into not throttling at 82C” … The code simply ignores any Windows Throttling and goes over 82C anyways, you know it, I know it.
IT SHOULD BE OPTIONAL TO THROTTLE YOUR CPU IN LIGHTMASS, It’s simply poorly designed that way. Please stop making excuses.
Allegations that my CPU is improperly installed with not even anecdotal experience with it, except everything else that stresses my CPU at less than 100% does not reach insane temperatures.
You may be thinking, basically Unreal Engine has gone into lumen and nanite, so older versions and those without the aforementioned Lighting technologies don’t mean anything anymore… So no fix for the laughable lack of Optional Throttling, instead, more sales for CPU manufactuerers.
Plenty of people have high temperatures using Lightmass, but oddly enough you’re the only one commenting. Please leave, Thanks.
And just in case, you seem to be the type that sees “Laughable,” “lack,” and Throttling;" However you don’t see the “Optional” probably because you don’t want to.
Level designers for games using Unreal Engine <5 are mostly forced to use Lightmass, Not GPU Lightass, because of lack of RayTracing. These are “Modders” who aren’t paid for their work, and even the Developers of these games need to be cautious.
Also, down-clocking my CPU isn’t a good option for an enthusiast… 99.9% of my apps and system are fine, but for this one malformed app i should downclock just for Lightmass? Sorry, i’m trying to be efficient while still enjoying my system for everything else, i’m not on a dedicated dev workstation.
There are plenty of normal people using their PCs for tons of stuff, including Content Creation, Gaming, Media, etc that suffer from this problem only with Lightmass; All the problem does is turn more people away from Unreal Engine.