Not gonna to you. But for something that is purely for exterior use, the model itself is pretty decent. One suggestion I would give is even though there are numerous examples in the real world of what seem incredibly odd shaped architecture, however these are designed by individuals who spend years studying how to incorporate practicality into unconventional design.
The things that immediately strike me as features that could present issues if this were an actually building in the real world is certain features of its slanted theme. Don’t get me wrong, the slanted theme is radical and I love it. But some changes you might want to make would be the angle of the mid-sections roof. It just seems like when it begins converging to the highest point in the building past the majority of the structure, that area would either be unused/wasted space OR it would be an area with minimal practicality because of the ceilings bizarre angle. My suggestion would be to make the ceiling level and maybe replace that angled ceiling with some sort of rooftop atrium or something else to give a unique flare.
The other thing that strikes me as a bit unpractical is the windows. A central theme of many science-based organizations in the past several years is an emphasis on the offices having direct access to as much natural light/sunlight as possible. I think the best example of this that I’m familiar with is the major medical research firm in Boston (well, technically Cambridge, but they’re more or less the same.) called Genzyme (Which, surprisingly enough, all the beautiful photos of the place don’t do it enough justice, in-person it’s even more beautiful than any photo could show.)
But my point in using this example is that the windows of your building are oddly arranged. By that I mean there’s a maybe 10-15% section that’s nice and covered in window’s but the rest of the building doesn’t appear to have any windows at all. You might want have windows on at least one side (preferable two or three sides) laden with windows for each major portion of the model. Lastly the spacing between each row of windows seems significantly thicker than it could be. There really only needs to be six inches to a foot of space between each row. An example of the evidence that I am personally familiar with is at the college I attend, Fitchburg State University. They opened a new, super-modern science center in 2013 and it displays the features I’m speaking about very well.
Other than those things, I think it’s very well done for a first try at something of this magnitude. One more pro tip, no matter what kind of model you’re making, ALWAYS use photo reference if you’re able. A number of my former classmates often believed that using references is some sort of handicap, but believe me its not. All the greatest Production/CGI artist use references. In fact, a relatively common practice in the industry when artists are brought onto new projects is for them to spend of the first week, sometimes two weeks, gathering reference photos and nothing else. I’ve had the entire walls in offices completely covered in thousands of reference photos, because it is easily the most valuable tool you will ever have.
Speaking of, here’s some photos from both Genzyme and the new FSU science center, to help kickstart your reference library. (FYI, you can never have enough reference photos, my reference library is probably 300GB+ by now!)
Genzyme Interior: https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-e4GWxtf1k9k/UpkGh52-WtI/AAAAAAAAAT4/M7lYpZajpPg/s1600/104_main_entrance_Haupteingang_41011_PC_Photo_A.jpg
Genzyme Exterior: http://www.archello.com/sites/default/files/104_West_facade_at_night_41413_PC_Photo_Anton_G.jpg
FSU Science Center: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/de/3e/62/de3e623db01fc22e40006e1c460ea91c.jpg
Hope this helps!
looks like something from Judge Dredd city btw how you made this snowy mountains landscape?
