-
I mostly tend to disagree with you about things you write on this forum. Especially being overly negative about pretty much all the aspects of the engine.
-
You tagged lots of us in your original post, and then under it you write “Either the abusive and censorship prone behavior from moderators and staff STOPS, or we will stop answering your client’s questions.”
Don’t do that. Speak just for yourself, not for the rest of us. (I believe) most of us answer the questions on this forum just out of the passion for the engine and the community. I don’t consider it being some altruistic way of helping Epic with the client support, especially since vast majority of the forum frequenters are using the engine for free. Most of those, who have reached that crazy high $1M revenue cap, and therefore became actual Epic’s clients, probably have access to UDN with much higher quality of client support.
That being said:
This is one of the rare occasions where I have to agree with you. As soon as corporate phrases like “We want to create an inclusive and open space…” start to get thrown around, things tend to go to $#!t really quickly 
EDIT:
Still, you are about 90% responsible for closure of that thread. Right before you joined that thread, it was just about positive excited speculations regarding what final UE5 could bring, but then you started to repeatedly derail it with your usual inflammatory negativity. If you never contributed to that thread, it would have never been closed.
Only the remaining 10% of the fault falls at PresumptivePanda for crossing the line between a mere explanation and corporate virtue signalling in the message they sent you. But compared to what you did, that’s negligible.