Metahuman - Blender

[anonymous_user_9181fec51 (anonymous_user_9181fec5)]

@post:#<Post:0x000055984ae89d28>

Did not examine myself - but, are they identical in name, or do they all just seem to be identical in function. If the latter, it may be an ‘unfinished’ naming convention the developers have in progress for later UI implementations. But, the blendshapes seem different than most of us are probably used to, they seem to control wrinkle maps and not the actual movement itself. Like, the blendshapes just augment the bone movement. (ie - a drop/open jaw blendshape makes the jaw’s wrinkle happen, but the jaw only actually opens with the jaw bone being rotated. Whereas we would have expected traditionally that the blendshape for Jaw open would actually show you the jaw opening.)

These blendshapes are different in name but actually identical in function. I open the fbx file in maya shown as below. You can see that I hide all other blendshapes but show the two blendshapes of jawOpen and jawLeft, however, these two blendshapes are almost the same. I do not know if it is because I change the number of LODs to 1 when I export the fbx file (following the solution of **** ), but the blendshapes are reaaly different from the traditional blendshapes. I have used the live link face of iphone to test the facial animation, which seems it is ok, so I feel quite confused about the blendshape mesh, which seems really different, anyone can give a explanation ?