Kind of. But I would replace Eugenics with Genocide.
Eugenics is controlling birth, and is not usually a reason for war.
Also, Isn’t is nice that we have an army to stop people from doing that?
Kind of. But I would replace Eugenics with Genocide.
Eugenics is controlling birth, and is not usually a reason for war.
Also, Isn’t is nice that we have an army to stop people from doing that?
People can perceive whatever they want. Try and refute the actual statistics. There are less wars, and the wars are less costly.
You have the same emotion-based argument when people complain about gun violence in the US, and yet the violence is at the lowest point since the 1980s.
I prefer facts and logic, and both of those currently point towards the US providing a safer world.
Note that I don’t want the US acting as world police, as beneficial as that appears to be for world peace. I would be more than happy if the US maintained it’s edge but stepped back and let China pick up the slack. Good luck with that.
link them
according to what and safer for who?
it is interesting to see how an american citizen views americas place in the world.
i would think, however, the vast majority of humans alive today worldwide would disagree with their ‘world police on a holy crusade’ view, and some very strongly indeed.
no disrespect to anyone of course, just an observation.
whatever you typed in google, type the opposite now.
Okay … this thread seems to have run its course now and has turned in to a slinging match. I am closing this thread. I think everyone has made their points and I am not sure the last few posts have actually been worth it.
Thread closed … should you wish to discuss politics and other stuff further … I recommend you find a politics forum. Thanks.