Document for the core redirect need to be corrected

Development Programming & Scripting
, ,
1

This was my shameful mistake.
I confused the debug mode binary and the development binary.
The document was correct, I was wrong. Enum need still E.
I apologize.

The document said,

ESampleEnum would remain ESampleEnum when referenced by a Core Redirect.

No. It is not correct in 5.2.

I renamed UENUM from my cpp code in my project.
To apply this to BP, I used the core redirect as usual.

~~And I faced so many blueprint compile errors.
It did not before. ~~

I remove “E” from core redirect, It works.

the code of 5.2 seems modified.
I think this have to apply to the document.

Is it correct to write here about this?
Or is there more good place to write about it?
Does I have to write a bug-report in separately format?