[docs] Incosistency on enums in the coding standards

In the Coding Standards document, the Strongly-Typed Enums section states that enum classes should be used instead of enum namespaces. However, the C++ Enums and Namespace Scoping section and the Namespaces section state that enum namespaces should always be used. This is inconsistent. Given the text in the Strongly-Typed Enums section, which states that wrapping enums in their own namespaces is the old, outdated way of doing things, the other two sections most likely need to be updated.

Hi codingteddybear,

Thank you for your report. I have entered a bug report, UEDOC-770 to be assessed by the documentation team.