Are Landscapes optimized?

Could I use a huge imported mesh for a landscape instead of the one built with the editor?

Iā€™m sure MostHostLA will chime in that landscapes + displacement/tessellation is garbage, and it basically is. Totally works but itā€™s a performance sink.

Iā€™m finding that the virtual heightfield mesh + runtime virtual textures offers a much more performant solution, comparatively. If that is ā€˜optimizedā€™ enough for youā€¦?

What I can say is there is often the direction of ā€œif you donā€™t really need it as a landscape, sculpt it as you wish and export that section as a static mesh. Reimport if you want to use as a background, etc.ā€. This makes sense since a static mesh would likely be more performant, particularly if itā€™s just a mountain you look at.

1 Like