I want to understand which set of developers customises the user experience with Space Mouse in any given application - is it the 3dconnexion developers or is it the application’s developers? I use Space Mouse in Bricscad and in Twinmotion. When the same 3D dwg-format model in Bricscad is imported via Bricscad’s built-in Datasmith link into Twinmotion, the Space Mouse experience in each is very different.
Basically, where do I request Support, report bugs, make Feature Requests? Or who to blame for the often clueless, poorly calibrated implimentation, and the failure to respond for years on end, to users’ frustrations on forums etc?
The user experience within applications is always in my experience, massively disappointing and frustrating, compared with the idealised smoothness of 3Dconnexion marketing and training videos https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P … 7AD4F7BA13 and 3Dconnexion>home>Trainer. Is there a basic set of ideal functionality that can work in any Windows application - until each application’s developers over-ride that and mess it up? Or not as simple as that!
Also, other applications have far more Space Mouse facilities and settings - like, on the Advanced page of SM Settings pop-up, where Twinmotion (and Bricscad) offer only Speed settings, for example Cinema 4D have additional pages for Navigation Modes (6 options), Rotation Center (4 different types, I’ve seen mentioned), and ‘Other’ - I want some Other!
These are settings which should be instantly available on the fly, not within layers of ultra-slow-response dialog pages.
Maybe this lack of controls is because I only have a 2-button Space Mouse Compact - maybe the bells-and-whistles Pro etc units do have these options even in Bricscad and Twinmotion.