Hi everyone,
I’m currently using RealityCapture to generate photogrammetry models as part of my work in landscape design, and I would appreciate some feedback on my current method for calibrating models using ground control points (GCPs).
Here’s how I’m proceeding:
- I fly a drone to capture aerial imagery of the site.
- On the ground, I’ve placed visible GCP markers prior to the flight.
- For elevation data, I use an optical level (dumpy level) on-site to measure the height differences between the GCPs.
- I also use a tape measure to determine ground distances between the GCPs to better understand their relative positioning.
Since I do not have accurate absolute coordinates (X, Y, or GPS values) for my GCPs, here’s the workaround I’ve been using:
- After aligning my model, I identify the GCPs as tie points.
- I then copy and paste their coordinates (as estimated by RealityCapture) into the Control Point setup.
- Finally, I modify only the Z-value (altitude) of each point based on my measured heights on site.
My questions are:
- Is this a valid method for improving vertical accuracy when absolute georeferencing isn’t available?
- Could this introduce distortion or misalignment in the model that I might not be aware of?
- If this approach is problematic, what would be a better method for creating a reasonably accurate site model without survey-grade equipment?
My end goal is to generate a site model accurate enough for conceptual design and terrain analysis in residential projects.
Thanks in advance for your time and insights.
Frederic
Landscape Architect – NSW, Australia