It’s funny that you opened a new thread asking the same question I answered you yesterday and you affirmed that it worked (in both threads), though you was faced by a new irrelevant issue (pawns not being possessed correctly), which I basically told you to open a new thread for after you investigate it yourself with the further info I provided you with which you need to look for. Looking at the code you posted in this thread I can tell you didn’t even fix what was noted to you at the end of my answer in the other thread, which 100% means you didn’t even got to read at least a few bits of the compendium I provided you with. I’m not going to interfere any further, as you don’t seem to quite fully listen to advice, but my last advice would be to give my notes another visit and reconsider how you listen to advices in the future!