I think it is a valid observation and I would prefer that asset didn’t exist, but that alone does not qualify for an asset removal I am afraid. The best course of action on things like this is to use the form Create a Case for the Marketplace and tell them your concerns. Another approach is also to ask the asset developer in question to at least state at the asset page, that it illustrate a point of view which might not be accurate and that the intent on the asset usage would be X or Y or both.
Marketplace is not here to take sides or to check if an asset contains world reality or not, they are here to check if the asset is technically well built and if does not contains offensive material in a broad sense. Would they have to exclude decapitated body models because decapitation is wrong? I guess not, because there is a use case in games for that.
I also reported the question on what you posted and got the answer from the staff, you should do the same.