Hey ivan,
it seems like you want to preserve your anonymity! 
I think it might be better to use the HW as identifier for exactly that reason. Maybe with the first letter of the name or so. But in my case the first name would be almost a 100% give-away…
The name is ok for internal purposes while testing but later I think it should be as neutral as possible when it goes public.
GCPs are not there to patch up a model but to geo-reference (scale) it. It’s an entirely standard procedure and it would make sure that the model is identical for everyone who runs the benchmark…