Upon setting my fps from 120 down to 60, my vehicle will be slightly faster, along with aerial physics also being increased. I will send images of the code upon requested. I’ve tried timers, substepping with the time between each generated frame etc… Nothing is yet to work. In this video I set fps …

don’t get tangled on minor things. optimal means the ideal trade-off between factors. so if it costs too much, and provide little value. is not optimal. it’s a waste. maybe later you find the answer. you’ve done a great work anyway. all the best :slight_smile:

[image] This is the accelerate function currently. As you can see, the “Tick Delta” is added at the bottom which is from my Event Tick

And ill send it again just in case this helps, this is the suspension of the vehicle. It was also acting up with the fps but I got it work consistent throughout. I also enabled “Substepping” in project settings and set the default delta max to 0.016667 [image]

Hmm maybe ive missed something with the add force.try this: Put the Accell function aside for now. Dont call it. Create a new function AccellTest, And make it super simple. Call AddForce, and calculate thef force as this ForwardVector* Speed * Dt And call it per tick. That will add a constant…

And then put it inside “suspension trace” function’s end. Or outside the function on the tick itself?

Either way it seems to not be moving anymore now. The way the other one functioned was through the wheel comps. It would base the force applied on where the wheel comp was. Front left, back right etc etc… (Since the car isn’t on the ground and is being pushed up by line traces) Alright so I multipl…

If your suspension trace is fine it would be the name. But im clad you tested ddrectry in tick to be sure. Ok, if i understand correctly, then you managed to isolate the issue to how the add force works. Unfortunately im not sure what the exact issue it is there.

Frame Rate affecting force of vehicle

Development Programming & Scripting Blueprint

denberZ1507 (denberZ1507) October 17, 2025, 9:39pm 32

correct?