That is actually very oposite of what I am suggesting. I want to be able to extend the asset quality for those who pay more. I don’t have time to answer every question to every customer who buy an asset for 20 bucks, but I am willing to provide the support for those who pay 50. It is not about cutting features. It is about providing more for the valuable customers. Same as the Windows license. You don’t just buy more expensive license. You get more expensive features for it. It is fair.
And if you can’t provide additional value, then perhaps you should not be able to raise the price. But why letting sellers to tripple the price if they are not obligated to anything for it? What’s your point?