Hehe. Sorry, I misread your question! Duh.
But I understand that you expect certain values to only make sense for certain aquisition methods. I think GPS is the only one that really matters and can only lead to problems IF it is present in images AND contradicts the coordinate system from other means of geo-referencing (e.g. laserscans in local systems).
This is really a relativistic question. You seem to expect there is a difference whether the camera moves through space (relative to the earth) as opposed to the camera remaining still (relative to the earth). But that really doesn’t matter. RC only cares for the movement of the camera relatice to the OBJECT. So if you use a turntable or move through a building with the camera has no impact on the way RC is calculating. With turntables it only (regularly) leads to problems if the background provides too many tie points and RC “decides” that this is the intended surface. Hence it is the good practice (and challenge) to chose the surroundings so that there are as few as possible (or even no) tie points at all stationary (relative to the camera). Does that make sense at all?