What do you think about Accidental Runner game

[Netrve]

@Jezcentral;269573

There’s no way to tell if a game is bad or not. You’d get people reporting Call of Duty, or Assassins Creed. To try and get a game taken off because you don’t believe it should be there is a judgement call, an opinion, not an objective question like “Is this using copyrighted ■■■■■?” Worse, you’d get people with agendas trying to close down games like Gone Home.

Hmm, I have to agree with you on that point. Many would try to abuse this system, but what I had in mind was that after some kind of report threshhold (something like a report to buy ratio? So if 10 people buy it and 9 report it for example) Valve would get their QA to look at the product. This might get big publishers in trouble too, take Ubisoft’s AC:Unity as example. That game was (or still is?) a mess.

@Jezcentral;269573

You can deflect that back at the buyer. If people cared more about the quality, they wouldn’t buy it. Accidental Runner’s awfulness is right there in the screen. There’s an auto-playing trailer and screenshots. There’s people warning you how bad it is in the player reviews. You have to jump through some hoops to buy the game. You can’t just buy it, and say you had no idea how bad it was.

My statement was direct towards in that market, not only to Valve. Resellers (in this case Valve with Steam), developers and publishers as well as the player/buyer, has some kind of responsibility when it comes to dealing with those games.
Still there are people who only buy these games because they think bad quality is funny, something I can’t comprehend.

Greetings,
Dakraid