[=;235761]
When I hear things like that I’m getting palpitations. How is C# easier to code than C++? It’s the same like saying riding a bike is easier than driving a car. C# is simply not as powerful as C++ and so it follows easier to learn. Not easier to code. Jesus…
[/]
C# is easier to code in because its memory safe, doesn’t have tons of syntax oddities, doesn’t requires redundant header files, compiles faster,
While C# can be used to develop lower level code in the “unsafe” block, C++ is easier to get more optimized code. So “easy” is context sensitive but most contexts pertaining to “easy” and how most think of it C# takes the cake. C#'s flaw in performance is hugely held back by the runtime rather then the lang itself (Although Core is only 3x as slow vs C++ now). C# as a syntax and means of reading code is easier but not when it comes to native, is where it needs some major work.