Don’t get me wrong, there are some computer graphics out there, that look like a photo, so you could call em photorealistic. This example is obviously not as you can see from the first glimpse that it’s computer generated. She looks nice and all is fine technically, but it has nothing to do with a photo or even photorealistic. Also I would not call it low-poly.
So why do you use those terms here, when they are obviously not fitting?
This is no ciritique of the art, just about the wording.