[=DanielBennifer;212791]
I’ve always thought of the CGTextures terms of service being slightly odd. Why? Well, because you can technically sell them, if you simply bundle them with a 3D asset or sample scene. Which means, you could essentially stick them onto a plane, package that up and sell them without.
[/]
A lot of it has to do with intent, which makes the usage tricky and is what actually got me all bundled up. I thought exactly the same thing you did. But if you’re more or less using the texture to directly compete with them in the area of work that they do, then they’ve put terms in there to stop that from happening. It’s pretty silly because in the indie market most people still need someone like us to make materials for them but their terms are theirs terms so not much we can do about it. We were going to make a texture pack originally and release it on the marketplace but we’re going to be concentrating on a map pack instead.