Nanite Performance is Not Better than Overdraw Focused LODs [TEST RESULTS]. Epic's Documentation is Dangering Optimization.

That was hardly toxic, though. You randomly spoke in 3rd person which is weird, even more so - deleting comments that don’t follow your narrative is just cringe and removes any and all of your credibility.

If people are being rude, sure. But you or “your PR” has been removing comments willy nilly.

I initially started following this thread because I was genuinely curious about the various test results, but some of your tests do seem, like many others have pointed out, to be quite unrealistic.

3D modeling takes time, making good LODs takes time, optimizing takes time. Time is money and Nanite does a good enough job eliminating that issue to an extent. It’s not by any means perfect, it definitely has its issues and limitations - but I would expect nothing less from a feature that is arguably still very experimental.

All that said, I think the main reason this thread is going off topic is partly because of you and your utter inability to accept the fact your tests may not be the “damning proof” you think it is.

Frankly, I found the views of the various other thread contributors to be more insightful than your various videos. But from a reader’s perspective it’s as if they’re trying to talk to a brick wall.

This thread started out intriguing but now it’s just silly.

11 Likes