No, it is not an official demonstration for a commercial product or project of any kind.
In this case all of these “projects” are meant for my own personal non-commercial hobby interest with no backing of any other 3rd parties.
Some of them might represent some actual projects or things in real life that may or may not yet exist but are being built or will be built and obviously have a lot of money involved, however I am not a party to those transactions and have zero connection to it, in this case I would be a fan, and instead of taking a piece of paper and drawing, I take UE4 and do it in 3D engine, because I’m a computer guy in my professional and personal capcity, I’m not a painter, I’m not a sculptur, didn’t do that since elementary school.
So if I was a sculptur and I when I have some free time I decide to use clay and sculpt the mount everest and display it in a local gallery for free, do I really have to notify the mining company that extracted that clay from the ground ? FWIW, if anyone has a better comparison, go for it.
I’m not trying to argue, I’m pointing out that this whole business model that Epic is attempting is in early stages and this unclarity is normal and expected, but shouldn’t be forgotten and should be improved, I’m simply pointing out that how vast the possibilities are and that the legal statements should more clearly define these types of project, whatever Epic chooses to allow and not allow is up to them, I won’t argue with it once they separate the many different kinds of “projects” that could be out there, ofcourse a lot of things would be put in groups, it doesn’t separate by content, but type.