You may wish to review what you both “clearly laid out” was a mixture of speculation and incorrect reading of the law. This is not a failure of my ability to understand the issue, I’ve made a decision based on available facts.
And that is where it all falls down. Without proof, it is all speculation and assumption. It is painting everyone as corrupt and in violation of the law.
I have nothing for sale on the marketplace nor have I considered selling AI assets or plans to do so. Again, you are making an attack based on speculation that is unfounded.
Again, my opinion on the matter matches with facts rather than supposition. Should the facts change, my opinion will change as well.
Well, considering he is well known to have violated copyright, I’m not sure I would consider him much of an expert.